Legal Opinion

Kuhns v. Board of Supervisors

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1982No. Civ. 26397PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN (Gerald), P. J.

Earl Stanley Kuhns, plaintiff, appeals conditions attached to a writ of mandate ordering the Santa Cruz Board of Supervisors, defendant, to issue him a planned development permit to operate a general bookstore. The board of supervisors cross-appeals claiming the court erred in granting the writ.

Kuhns is the owner of property in Santa Cruz. He applied for a planned development permit .to operate “Frenchy’s,” an adult bookstore. His application was rejected because such a store would violate a Santa Cruz County zoning ordinance. 1 A year later Kuhns reapplied for a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Smith v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Perrine v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. American Civil Liberties Union v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Lucero)California Supreme Court · 1989
  2. City of Indio v. ArroyoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  3. City of Whittier v. Walnut Properties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Strand Property Corp. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. City of Vallejo v. Adult BooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API