Legal Opinion

State v. Gonzalez-Faguaga

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2003No. S-02-172PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

In October 2000, Oscar Gonzalez-Faguaga, under a plea agreement, pled no contest to one count of first degree assault. Gonzalez-Faguaga subsequently moved for postconviction relief. The district court denied his motion without an evidentiary hearing. The issue is whether the district court should have held an evidentiary hearing on Gonzalez-Faguaga’s claim that his trial counsel was ineffective.

He alleges that his counsel failed to bring to the trial court’s attention that the State had breached the plea agreement. Because Gonzalez-Faguaga pled sufficient facts to show ineffective assistance…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. SilversNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State v. FaustNebraska Supreme Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Andrew James LopezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
  2. State v. LeahyNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. McHenryNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. MarshallNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. RochaNebraska Supreme Court · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API