Legal Opinion

People v. McNutt

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 1940No. Cr. A. 1707PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.

Defendant was charged with the offense of reckless driving and convicted thereof. He appeals from the judgment, contending that the evidence is insufficient .to show his guilt of that offense. With this contention we agree.

Reckless driving is made a misdemeanor by section 505 of the Vehicle Code, which, as amended in 1939, defines that offense as follows, reading only the words outside the brackets: “Any person who drives any vehicle upon a highway in [such a manner as to indicate either a] wilful or [a] wanton»disregard for the safety of persons or property is guilty of reckless driving.”…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McCann v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Burns's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Weber v. PinyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. People v. DellingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Kwan v. Mercedes-Benz of North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. People v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. State v. TamanahaHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
  5. People v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API