Legal Opinion

Berrisford v. Berrisford

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 13, 1982No. 82-62PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERSON, Justice.

In this action for dissolution of the marriage of appellant, Keith Berrisford, and respondent, Katherine Berrisford, the trial court denied appellant’s motion for an order requiring the parties and Charity Constance Berrisford, born a few months after the parties’ marriage, to submit to blood tests following appellant’s denial of the child’s paternity. We have concluded that under the circumstances of this case the motion should have been granted.

Appellant and respondent were married on May 19, 1978. Charity was born August 25,1978. Appellant then signed an appliea tion for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Clevenger v. ClevengerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Hepfel v. BashawSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. In Re Marriage of ValleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. In re the Final Account of BesondySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  5. Remkiewicz v. RemkiewiczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Knill v. KnillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  2. W. v. W.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. State v. BarteltWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Pietros v. PietrosSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  5. A.R. v. C.R.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API