Legal Opinion

Gifford Drainage District v. Shroer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1896No. 17,285PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From tlie Jasper Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, C. J.

— Appellants, other than the Gifford Drainage District, commenced this proceeding under section twenty-two of the district drainage act of 1893. Acts of 1893, pp. 316-328, (R. S. 1894, sections 5718-5742).

Appellees were the owners of lands in the proposed district who had not signed the agreement provided for in said section. After the classification roll had been confirmed by the board of commissioners, as required by said section, appellees appealed to the court below, where, on their motion, the proceeding was dismissed upon the. ground that said act was unconstitutional. The question of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Donnelly v. DeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Anderson v. Kerns Draining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Ross v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Kinnie v. BareMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Zigler v. MengesIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Billings Sugar Co. v. FishMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Bemis v. Guirl Drainage Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Thomas R. Crowel v. Marshall County Drainage BoardIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In Re Rhode Island Suburban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1901
  5. Roundenbush v. MitchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API