United States v. Edward J. Arlt, III

This is Arlt’s second appeal from his conviction, under 26 U.S.C. § 7205. On his first appeal where his sole contention was that the district court should have allowed him to be represented by counsel, we affirmed his conviction. United States v. Arlt, 5 Cir., 1977, 560 F.2d 200.

Appellant is not entitled to two appeals. Therefore, this second appeal is not properly before this Court.

However, even if this second appeal were properly before this Court, we find the contentions raised in appellant’s pro se briefs to be without merit.

Appellant first contends that the indictment was the result of…