Saenz v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
BAIRD, Judge.
After the trial judge denied appellant’s motion to suppress the contraband alleged in the indictment, appellant proceeded to trial and was convicted by a jury of aggravated possession of marihuana pursuant to Tex.Health <& Safety Code Ann. § 481.-121(c). The jury assessed punishment at five years confinement and a fine of $5,000.00. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Saenz v. State, No. 08-89-00351-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso, delivered January 23, 1991) (not published). Appellant presents one ground for review claiming her initial…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Delrio v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Arcila v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Saldano v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- State v. JohnstonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- State v. CortezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2018
- Loesch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- Renteria v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.