Loesch v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YÁÑEZ, Justice.
We review this ease on remand. We originally reversed the cause because we found the trial court had abused its discretion in failing to suppress the evidence seized, which abuse led to appellant’s conviction. Loesch v. State, 921 S.W.2d 405 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1996). The court of criminal appeals vacated our decision, however, because we individually analyzed the factors upon which the arresting agents relied on in deciding to stop the vehicle, rather than analyzing them under the totality of the circumstances. Loesch v. State, 958 S.W.2d 830, 832…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sanders v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
- CONTRARAS v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
- Gutierrez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2000
- Renteria v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- David Flores, Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.