Melup v. Rubber Corp. of America
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.
The plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendants from interfering with him in the discharge of his office as a director of the corporate defendant. In brief, the basis of complaint is that they have obstructed his right of access as a director and stockholder to the corporation’s plant and factory and have threatened to physically eject him if he should come there; that his presence is tolerated provided he is accompanied by an escort; that he is not permitted to freely converse with employees; that anything he might say to or discuss with employees would be overheard by his unwanted accompanist,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hobbs v. Tom Reed Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Wilkins v. M. Ascher Silk Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- People Ex Rel. Wilkins v. M. Ascher Silk Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- People ex rel. Lehman v. Consolidated Fire Alarm Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Bellman v. Standard Match Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bowling v. Jack B. Parson CompaniesIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. SEIBERLING RUBBER COMPANYSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
- Baker v. Henry Glass & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1988
- Posen v. United Aircraft Products, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1952
- Chappel v. Applied Control Systems Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.