Legal Opinion
State v. SEIBERLING RUBBER COMPANY
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided March 1, 1961No. 1733, Civil Action, 1960PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Terry, P. J.:
This is an action in mandamus instituted by Eugene Farber against Seiberling Rubber Company, a Delaware corporation. Farber, as a director of Seiberling, demanded access to the corporate stock ledger. His demand was refused. His petition herein seeking a list of the stockholders or inspection of the stock ledger is in the usual form. Seiberling in its answer has averred in substance that Father’s motive in attempting to obtain the stockholders’ list is improper, and, if the prayer of his petition be granted, such an inspection will result in a detriment to the corporation. Farber…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Machen v. Machen & Mayer Electrical Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Strassburger v. Philadelphia Record Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Fowler v. MumfordSuperior Court of Delaware · 1954
- Wilkins v. M. Ascher Silk Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
- Davis v. Keilsohn Offset Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wright v. Heizer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Henshaw v. American Cement CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1969
- Lenahan v. National Computer Analysts Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1973
- Wright v. Heizer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Scattered Corp. v. Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.