Legal Opinion

Hudacs v. Frito-Lay, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph Harris, J.

Petitioner moves seeking a judgment pursuant to CPLR article 78 vacating an order of the Industrial Board of Appeals dated December 30, 1991.

Respondents deny the substantive allegations of the petition and assert several affirmative defenses.

FACTS

Respondent Frito-Lay employs route salespersons whose job responsibilities include delivering Frito-Lay snack products to retail stores and collecting payments on behalf of the company from the retail stores for products sold to them.

Each workday morning a route salesperson obtains the amount of product needed to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hudacs v. Frito-Lay, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Hudacs v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API