Legal Opinion
Hudacs v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 17, 1997PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Wesley, J.
On the particular facts of this case, we hold that respondent, Frito-Lay, Inc. did not violate Labor Law § 193, which prohibits an employer from making unauthorized deductions from wages, when it required its route salespeople to remit moneys collected from customers upon delivery of inventory, since these repayments to the company were unrelated to and independent from the payment of wages.
I
Respondent Frito-Lay, Inc. manufactures and distributes snack foods. As part of its distribution process, it employs route salespeople who pick up the snack foods from the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hudacs v. Frito-Lay, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Hudacs v. Frito-Lay, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1994
- Rownd v. New York State Guernsey Breeders' Co-operative, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1949
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hart v. Rick's Cabaret International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Epifani v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Bader v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Levy v. Verizon Information Services Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Ackerman v. New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of QueensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.