Legal Opinion

Miller v. City of Dayton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 3, 1992No. LUBA 91-170; CA A73904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s dismissal of his appeal from the City of Dayton’s decision to enlarge a basketball court in Courthouse Square Park. The park is listed on the National Register of Historic Places. However, the city has not designated or regulated it as a Goal 5 resource in its comprehensive plan and land use regulations as originally acknowledged or as revised for periodic compliance review in 1986. LUBA concluded that the decision was not reviewable as a “land use decision” defined in ORS 197.015(10)(a) and that it also did not come within LUBA’s jurisdiction under the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Byrd v. StringerOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Jackson Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Urquhart v. Lane Council of GovernmentsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Foland v. Jackson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Mill Creek Glen Protection Ass'n v. Umatilla CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ramsey v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Maguire v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Miller v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API