Isip v. World Financial Group
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Erlinda Isip and Faye Perez, No. CV-18-04182-PHX-SMB 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 World Financial Group, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is World Financial Group’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 12, 16 “Mot.”). World Financial Group (“WFG”) asks the Court to dismiss the Complaint (Doc. 17 1, “Complaint”) because Plaintiff Erlinda Isip’s claims are barred by the statute of 18 limitations and this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over WFG for Plaintiff Faye Perez’s 19 claims. Plainitff Erlinda Isip…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.