Legal Opinion

Mosko v. Dunbar

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 1, 1957No. 17779PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court · HallJustice Hall

This matter is presented to this court on an agreed Statement of The Case, the pertinent provisions thereof being:

1. Plaintiffs in error, referred to herein as plaintiffs are engaged in the business of buying and selling motor vehicles, each is duly licensed as a motor vehicle dealer under C.R.S. ’53, 13-11.

2. Plaintiffs prior to April 8, 1955, had kept their places of business open on Sundays and desire to continue so to do.

3. The Fortieth General Assembly of the state of Colorado enacted a statute known as House Bill No. 45, effective April 8, 1955, now C.R.S. ’53, 13-20-1, et seq., in…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Knous.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Washington National Insurance v. Board of Review of New Jersey Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Baum v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  3. In Re Interrogatory Propounded by Governor Roy Romer on House Bill 91S-1005Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  4. Diamond Auto Sales, Inc. v. ErbeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  5. City of Montrose v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API