In Re Interrogatory Propounded by Governor Roy Romer on House Bill 91S-1005
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
The Governor of the State of Colorado has submitted an interrogatory to this court pursuant to Colorado Constitution, article VI, section 3, asking whether House Bill No. 91S-1005, in conjunction with House Bill No. 91S-1009, is constitutional under five specific provisions of the Colorado Constitution. We now hold and determine that House Bill No. 91S-1005, on its face, does not violate any of these five constitutional provisions.
I
The governor’s interrogatory requested this court’s opinion on the following questions:
Is House Bill No. 91S-1005 titled “Concerning Incentives to Establish a New…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Gulf Offshore Co. v. Mobil Oil Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Williams v. Mayor of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Shell Oil Co. v. Iowa Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bloomer v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Estate of Stevenson Ex Rel. Talovich v. Hollywood Bar & Cafe, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- City of Greenwood Village v. for the Proposed City of CentennialSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Sierra Club v. Department of Transportation of the StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2009
- Submission of Interrogatories on House Bill 99-1325Supreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Submission of Interrogatories on Senate Bill 93-74Supreme Court of Colorado · 1993
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.