Legal Opinion
Berkau v. City of Little Rock
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 17, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
-This appeal questions the validity of ordinance No. 3999 of the city of Little Bock, for the violation of which appellant was convicted. Section 1 of this ordinance reads as follows:
“Section 1. That it shall be unlawful for any person to erect, construct, maintain or hang- from any building or any other support, any sign other than electric signs of all steel construction, and shall conform to the requirements of that section of ordinance No. 2799, regulating street electric signs hanging or extending over sidewalks of the city of Little Bock, as follows(certain streets constituting the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Edgar A. Levy Leasing Co. v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- St. Louis Poster Advertising Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Van Hovenberg v. HolmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
- BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, FAYETTEVILLE v. Osage Oil & Transp., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Seiz v. City of Hot SpringsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
- Congress Hotel Co. v. Samuel, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1948
- City of Fayetteville v. S & H, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.