Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Super
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 12, 2000PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAbrams, J.
The Commonwealth sought relief from a single justice of this court pursuant to G. L. c. 211, § 3, from a decision of a Superior Court judge ordering a required finding of not guilty for the defendant, James Super. The single justice ruled that the motion was properly before him pursuant to G. L. *493c. 211, § 3, and granted the Commonwealth’s petition for relief. The defendant now appeals from this judgment. We agree that the Commonwealth correctly invoked the extraordinary powers under G. L. c. 211, .§ 3. See note 5, infra. We vacate the judgment of the single justice and affirm the required…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Richardson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Commonwealth v. DascalakisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Costarelli v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Selectmen of Topsfield v. State Racing CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Commonwealth v. Lam Hue ToMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Carey v. New England Organ BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Gonzalez v. Justices of the Municipal Court of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Halebian v. BervMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Box Pond Ass'n v. Energy Facilities Siting BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Commonwealth v. GonzalezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.