Legal Opinion

Ensley v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 6, 1986No. 8530SC1073PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

Defendant raises no issues with respect to the trial, the verdict of the jury, or the award of damages to plaintiff. Its only assignments of error are directed to the award of pre-judgment interest and the taxing of court costs. The thrust of defendant’s argument is that its obligations to plaintiff arise strictly out of the contract of insurance providing coverage against damages caused by uninsured motorists, which does not provide coverage for pre-judgment interest or court costs. Therefore, defendant contends, the pre-judgment interest provision of G.S. 24-5 does not apply…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Moore v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company GroupSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Dixon, Odom & Co. v. SledgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Hoskins v. HoskinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Baxley v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Woods v. Farmers Insurance of Columbus, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Baxley v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Creed v. R.G. Swaim & Son, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  5. Levasseur v. LoweryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API