Legal Opinion
Manget v. Cunningham
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 27, 1928No. 6039PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.)
Conceding that the agents who represented Mrs. Treadwell in the sale of this property perpetrated a fraud upon Manget by representing that the property was bringing in a monthly rental of $300 and that there was outstanding on the property a first mortgage of $14,500, which representations were made to induce Manget to enter into the contract to purchase, made in January, 1923, and which did induce him to enter into said contract by which he agreed to pay for said property $21,500, to be paid by the assumption of an incumbrance of .$14,500 on the property,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tuttle v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Williams v. FottchéSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Bacon & Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Hunt v. Hardwick & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Jordy v. DunlevieSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Brown v. Ragsdale Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Wilhite v. MaysSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Bill Spreen Toyota, Inc. v. JenquinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Carpenter v. CurtisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Condios, Inc. v. DriverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.