Bill Spreen Toyota, Inc. v. Jenquin
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
Amy Jenquin made a trade with the defendant appellant, turning in her car and purchasing a secondhand vehicle described in the sale contract as a “used 1974 Célica Toyota coupe, identification number RA21-129922” for a total price of $3,792.14. The bill of sale *856specified “AS IS” and, under comments, “No warranty expressed or implied.” Plaintiff discovered 10 weeks after the sale and after the vehicle began leaking badly that it was not the vehicle represented in the bill of sale, but that the original vehicle described as the Toyota coupe RA21-129922 had, prior to this…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Brown v. Techdata Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Brown v. Ragsdale Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Tuttle v. StovallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Bagley v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Silva v. StevensSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
- Ben Farmer Realty Co. v. WoodardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- U-Haul Co. v. Dillard Paper Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- McCabe v. Daimler AGDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
- Orion Capital Partners, L. P. v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.