Heintz v. Mueller
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom Porter Superior Court; H. B. Tuihill, Judge. Action by Louis Heintz against Paul H. Mueller to rescind a contract on account of fraud. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtComstock, J.
— Appellee brought this action against appellant to recover the sum of $950 with interest, said sum having been paid by appellee to appellant for 350 shares of stock of the Crystal Eock Salt Mining Company, a corporation. Appellee claimed that he was induced to buy the stock by false and fraudulent statements made to him by the appellant concerning the property and standing of the company. Two trials have been had in the court below, each resulting in a verdict and judgment for appellee.
This is the second appeal to this court. Hpon the former appeal the judgment of the trial court was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Adams v. MainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Craig v. FrazierIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Surber v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Terry v. ShivelyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Anderson v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Indiana Union Traction Co. v. ScribnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
- Folsom v. ButtolphIndiana Court of Appeals · 1924
- Fox v. BarekmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Indiana Natural Gas & Oil Co. v. WilhelmIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
- Indianapolis, Greenwood & Franklin Railroad v. HubbardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905