Legal Opinion
Joy Mfg. Co. v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 15, 1939PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANDELBAUM, District Judge.
This is a motion by the defendant to vacate and quash a: notice under Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c for the taking of the depositions of certain officers of the defendant, the City of New York. The action seeks to recover part of the purchase price of snow removal equipment bought by the City for the use of-the Department of Sanitation and the officers sought to be examined include' the Commissioner of the Department of Sanitation, the Director of Motor Equipment for that Department and the Chief and the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davidson v. . the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Uvalde Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Bush Terminal Company v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Laverett v. Continental Briar Pipe Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1938
- Krier v. MuschelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fay v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1958
- Karno-Smith Co. v. School Dist. of City of ScrantonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1942
- Conneway v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1940
- Drum v. Town of TonawandaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1952
- Kasitch v. City of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940