Legal Opinion

Drum v. Town of Tonawanda

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided December 18, 1952No. 5043PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff has moved for an order compelling defendant Town of Tonawanda properly to comply with Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S. C. A., by answering certain interrogatories, or, in the alternative, for an order striking the answer of said defendant and granting judgment to plaintiff.

At the outset it may be stated that interrogatories serve two separate and distinct purposes: To ascertain facts and to narrow the issues. With the first function we are familiar. The second function may be attained by exacting admissions or obtaining commitments as to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bowles v. Safeway Stores, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1945
  2. Lewis v. United Air Lines Transport CorporationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1939
  3. Nichols v. Sanborn Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938
  4. Onofrio v. American Beauty Macaroni Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1951
  5. Nakken Patents Corp. v. RabinowitzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Wood v. BreierDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
  3. Fitzpatrick v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API