Hickman v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
No statement is required.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
The indictment charges that appellant, on the 2d day of July, 1902, forged the following instrument:
“Wichita Falls, Texas, July 2, 1892. No. —. The Panhandle National Bank of Wichita Falls pay to E. H. Smith or Bearer Seven-Dollars $7.00. Boney Mclntire.”
The indictment contains neither explanatory averments nor innuendo allegations. Motion to quash was based, first, upon the ground that the instrument itself shows that the offense was barred by the statute of limitations when presented by the grand jury; second, that it was re pugnant in its averments, in that the…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Ex Parte HoardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Odle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Richards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Owen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.