Richards v. State

On the question of the insufficiency of the indictment, appellant cites Bishop’s Crim. Proc., 3rd Ed. Vol. 1, paragraphs 489-492; Edgerton v. State, 70 S. W. 90; Hardeman v. State, 16 Tex. Ct. App. 1; Pisano v. State, 34 Tex. Crim. Rep. 63; Cain v. State, 18 Tex. 392.

On the proposition as to it being error to submit to the jury the question of forgery by making a false instrument and charging a forgery by fraudulent alternating a genuine instrument, appellant cites Johnson v. State, 40 Tex. Crim. Rep. 605.

On the question as to whether an instrument that is in violation of the law and upon…