Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Smith

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 19, 2005No. PD-0616-04PublishedCited by 203 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

We granted the State’s petition in this case to determine whether a defendant may complain about the sufficiency of a tolling allegation in a petition for a pretrial writ of habeas corpus.1 We decide that he may not. When a charging instrument shows on its face that prosecution is barred by the statute of limitations and that pleading is not reparable, a defendant may seek relief from a time-barred prosecution by a pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus. If, on the other hand, the information or indictment does contain a tolling allegation, any errors, omissions, or defects in…

3Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Studer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Ex Parte WeiseCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Proctor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Ex Parte RathmellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by203 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DosterCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
  2. Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
  3. Tita v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. Ex Parte Devan S. Matthews, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
  5. Phillips, William RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011

198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API