Legal Opinion

Lamb v. Consumers Power Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1938No. Docket No. 1, Calendar No. 40,014PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

This is an action under the survival act, 3 Comp. Laws 1929, § 14040 (Stat. Ann. § 27.684), to recover damages for the death of Robert Lee Lamb caused by coming in contact with a high tension wire owned and maintained by defendant company. The defendant company, a corporation, is engaged in generating and transmitting electricity. It maintains an electric power line in Wheatland township, Mecosta county, Michigan. The line was constructed to carry 6,600 volts, but later improved to carry 11,000 volts.

Plaintiff, Earl A. Lamb, as administrator of the estate of Robert Lee Lamb, deceased, was the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Temple v. McComb City Electric Light & Power Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Dwight Mfg. Co. v. WordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Benton v. North Carolina Public-Service Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Clumfoot v. St. Clair Tunnel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Mollica v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Company v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  2. Town of Clinton v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  3. Dees v. L. F. Largess Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  4. Blackwell v. Alabama Power CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  5. Bridges Ex Rel. Bridges v. Arkansas-Missouri Power Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API