Legal Opinion
Rovnak v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided April 13, 1999No. 06-98-00062-CRPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice GRANT.
Richard Rovnak appeals his conviction for possession of marihuana in an amount of 2,000 pounds or less, but more than fifty pounds. After the trial court denied Rov-nak’s motion to suppress, Rovnak entered a plea of guilty pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. The trial court assessed punishment at five years’ confinement in the TDJC-ID, probated, and a $2,000 fine. Rovnak timely filed a general notice of appeal.
Rovnak contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the warrantless search which produced the complained-of evidence…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Romero v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Matthews, Cornelious L.Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Maysonet v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
- Freeman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2001
- Green v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
- Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.