Legal Opinion
Ficklin v. Rusinko
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided January 8, 2019No. 6:18-CV-06310 EAWPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ELIZABETH A. WOLFORD, United States District Judge
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Terrick Ficklin ("Plaintiff") commenced this action on April 20, 2018, alleging that Parole Officers Douglas Rusinko ("P.O. Rusinko") and Carl Jason ("P.O. Jason") unlawfully arrested him and subjected him to an unwarranted and illegal body cavity search in order to obtain information about crimes unrelated to his parole status. (Dkt. 1). Plaintiff also alleges that Parole Officer Kathryn VanDusen ("P.O. VanDusen") unlawfully arrested him on a separate occasion without a warrant. (Id. at 15-16). Plaintiff asserts claims…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bostic v. PenceDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2023
- Chilson v. Del ToroDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2024
- Ficklin v. RusinkoDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
- M.Q. v. Kenneth GenaloDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
- Montana v. The City of UticaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.