Legal Opinion

Ficklin v. Rusinko

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided September 14, 2020No. 6:17-cv-06684Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TERRICK FICKLIN, DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff, v. 6:18-CV-06310 EAW DOUGLAS RUSINKO and CARL JASON, Defendants. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Terrick Ficklin (“Plaintiff”) commenced this action against Parole Officers Douglas Rusinko (“P.O. Rusinko”), Carl Jason (“P.O. Jason”), and Kathryn VanDusen (“P.O. VanDusen”), asserting several claims. (Dkt. 1 at 7-17). By Decision and Order dated January 8, 2019, the Court granted in part and denied in part the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, and dismissed P.O. VanDusen from the action. (Dkt. 8).…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API