Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Underdue-Frazier

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 2002No. 02-FM-379PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

We confront the question whether an appellant’s alleged reliance on erroneous information from court personnel provides a basis for invoking the “unique circumstances” doctrine so as to save an untimely appeal from dismissal. On April 4, 2002, appellant noted this pro se appeal from a judgment of absolute divorce entered in the trial court on February 6, 2002. After this court directed him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as untimely, he filed a response contending that he relied on an unidentified court employee’s statement that he had sixty days…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Howard James Moore v. South Carolina Labor BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
  2. Frain v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. In re C. I. T.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Robinson v. EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. In the Matter of AlexanderDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Faggins v. FischerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Clark v. BridgesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Calhoun v. WACKENHUT SERVICESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. McDowell v. Southwest DistributionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. CARROLL v. SUNRISE DETOX CHERRY HILL, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API