Legal Opinion
McKenney v. Apfel
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided January 12, 1999No. 96-1478-JTMPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MARTEN, District Judge.
This is an action for judicial review of a nondisability determination by plaintiff Albert D. McKenney. McKenney requests the court to reverse the decision of the Secretary and grant him-judgment, or in the alternative, to remand the case to the Secretary for further proceedings. McKenney seeks disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401 et seq. and supplemental security income (SSI) benefits based on disability .under Title XVI of the Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381 et seq. The Commissioner opposes McKenney’s…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Linda S. Thompson v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Rhonda Kay RAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bates v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- Brown v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2005
- Hill v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- Forson v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003