Legal Opinion

Danow v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1967PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

These three issues are presented by the instant appeal:(1) Was there any evidence to support the jury finding of negligence with respect to speed on the part of Smaglick; (2) did the trial court err in submitting both speed and management and control as elements of negligence with respect to Smaglick; (3) did the trial court err in failing to instruct as to the duties of Peterson as to lookout and yielding the right-of-way and the rights of an arterial driver to rely thereon?

Smaglick’s Speed.

The trial court refused to submit the issue of Smaglick’s speed in excess of the posted speed limit to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rodenkirch v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Lisowski v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Schlueter v. GradyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Odya v. QuadeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Plog v. ZolperWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  2. Leckwee v. GibsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Burch v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API