Legal Opinion

HYK Construction Co. v. Smithfield Township

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 19, 2010No. 2047 C.D. 2009PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge KELLEY.

Smithfield Township (Township) and the Board of Supervisors of Smithfield Township (Board) (collectively, Appellants) appeal from a final order of the Court of Common Pleas of Monroe County (trial court), which granted the equitable relief requested by HYK Construction Company, Inc. (HYK) by appointing an independent hearing examiner to hold conditional use hearings on HYK’s conditional use application and denying party litigant status to Smithfield Township Environmental Advisory Council (EAC). We vacate and remand.

The facts of this case are as follows. On April…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Sprague v. CaseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Borough of Green Tree v. Board of Property Assessments, Appeals & ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Bucks County Services, Inc. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Corman v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. In re SilvermanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. D. Sobat and E. Sobat v. The Borough of Midland ~ Appeal of: E. SobatCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Public Advocate v. BrunwasserCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API