Legal Opinion
In Re Casas
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 6, 1935No. Crim. 290PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, Acting P. J.
Petitioners are before this court on an original proceeding of habeas corpus to test the legality of. their confinement by the sheriff of Riverside County. - They were found guilty in the Justice’s Court of Temescal Township, in Riverside County, of the offense of disturbing the peace and judgments were pronounced upon them. They twice appealed to the Superior Court of Riverside County. The judgments were affirmed as was an order denying their motions to vacate the judgments.
Petitioners present but two reasons for their release which it is necessary to consider here. They maintain, first,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cadenasso v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Briggs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- In Re GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Lowrey v. HogueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- In Re BrainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hart Bros. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Dale v. City Court of MercedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- In re TiptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942