Legal Opinion
R.L. McCoy, Inc. v. Jack
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided July 11, 2001No. 49A02-0011-CV-749PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARTEAU, Senior Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Nonparty - Defendant-Appellant RL. McCoy, Inc., ("McCoy") appeals from the trial court's order denying McCoy's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement against Michael and Amy Jack ("the Jacks"). We reverse.
ISSUE
McCoy raises the following issue for our review: whether the trial court erred by denying McCoy's motion to enforce the settlement agreement entered into between McCoy and the Jacks.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The Jacks brought a personal injury claim against McCoy, Three Rivers Barricade & Equipment Co., Inc., S.E. Johnson Companies,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- American Transport Co. v. Central Indiana Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1970
- City of Bloomington v. HoltIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- Barker v. ColeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Mendenhall v. SKINNER AND BROADBENT CO.Indiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Hagerman Construction, Inc. v. CopelandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- R.L. McCoy, Inc. v. JackIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Estate of Helms v. Helms-HawkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- S.E. Johnson Companies, Inc. v. JackIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Vanesse Fort, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Eric K. Fort, Deceased v. C.W. Keller Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Fort, Vanesse v. CW Keller TruckingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003