Legal Opinion

Polak & Schwarz, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 15, 1951No. C. D. 1312PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ekwall, Judge:

A commodity described as “Raspberry Flavour Flavoring Extract,” entered at the port of New York; was classified and assessed with duty as a flavoring extract containing 20 per centum or less of alcohol under the appropriate paragraph of the Tariff Act of 1930. In addition to the regular customs duty it was assessed with an internal revenue tax of $9 per wine gallon under section 2800 (a) (1) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (26 U. S. C. A. p. 528, and 58 Stat., part 1, p. 61), following the general definition of “Distilled spirits,” as set forth in section 2809 (b) (1)…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jordan v. RocheSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Wing Yee Chong & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. Allen v. Liquid Carbonic Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  4. Distillers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Heublein, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API