Legal Opinion

Wing Yee Chong & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 26, 1922No. 2143PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

The goods invoiced as Oo-Kok, Wo-Chork, Kop Kai, Non Sun, Wai Sang, Chun Lo, Fu Kwat, Pak Sui, Tsz Po, Tad Tar, Shum Yong, and MoyLo, medicated spirits, were classified by the collector as medicinal preparations containing- alcohol and were assessed for duty at 20 per cent ad valorem and at 20 cents and 40 cents per pound, according to alcoholic content, under paragraph 16 of the tariff act of 1913. In addition to.this duty the collector assessed a duty of $2.20 per proof .gallon under the provisions of section 600 of the revenue act of 1918, approved February 24, 1919. The pertinent parts of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kwong Chin Chong v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1902

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  2. Wah Shang Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
  3. Wing Duck Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  4. Distillers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1942
  5. Polak & Schwarz, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API