Legal Opinion

State v. Johnson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 21, 2018No. 57PA17PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEASLEY, Justice.

**871 The Court of Appeals concluded that defendant's inculpatory statements to law enforcement were given under the influence of fear or hope caused by the interrogating officers' statements and actions and were therefore involuntarily made. State v. Johnson , --- N.C.App. ----, ----, 795 S.E.2d 625 , 639-40 (2017). The unanimous Court of Appeals panel held that the confession should have been suppressed but concluded the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt due to the overwhelming evidence of defendant's guilt. Id. at ----, 795 S.E.2d at 641 . For the reasons stated…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021
  2. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API