Legal Opinion

Coup v. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1885PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Chambers, J.) Case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff, who is a circus proprietor sued defendant as a carrier for injuries to cars and equipments, and to "persons and animals caused by a collision of two trains made up of his circus cars, while in' transit through Illinois-The court below held defendant to the common-law liability o£ a common carrier and held there was no avoiding liability by reason of a special contract under which the transportation was directed. The principal questions raised on the trial arose out of discussions concerning the nature of defendant’s *113employment, and questions of damage. Some other points also…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mann v. White River Log & Booming Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. KeeferIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Forepaugh v. Del. R., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1889
  3. Russell v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MahoneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Carolina, Clinchfield & Ohio Railroad v. Unaka Springs Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1914

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API