Legal Opinion

O'Ferrell v. United States

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided March 24, 1998No. CIV. A. 92-A-1450-SPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ALBRITTON, District Judge.

This cause is before the court on the Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by defendant FBI Special Agent Stephen E. Brannan on December 10, 1997. Brannan’s motion and the response from the Plaintiffs rely on matters outside of the pleadings; therefore, the motion is due to be treated as a motion for summary judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b). For the reasons stated below, the motion is due to be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

I. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c),…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. SIMS EX REL. SIMS v. GloverDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1999
  2. Ganek v. LeibowitzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. Roddy v. City of HuntsvilleDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API