Legal Opinion
Prairie Wood Products v. Glickman
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 10, 1997No. 96-6058-HO, 95-1519-HOPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HOGAN, Chief Judge.
These two consolidated cases involve challenges to the United States Forest Service’s decision to implement certain resource conservation policies in nine national forests pending completion of long term forest plan strategy. The Prairie Wood Products plaintiffs (Prairie Wood plaintiffs) move for summary judgment under the National Forest Management Act (NFMA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (# 40). The Blue Mountain Native Forest Alliance plaintiffs (Blue Mountain…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lands Council v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Siskiyou Regional Education Project v. RoseDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1999
- Wilderness Society v. BosworthDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2000
- Oregon Natural Desert Ass'n v. SingletonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1998
- League of Wilderness Defenders-Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.