League of Wilderness Defenders-Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. United States Forest Service
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARSH, Senior District Judge.
On June 6, 2006, Magistrate Judge Pa-pak issued a Findings and Recommendation (F & R) that plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (# 19) should be denied and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment (# 48) should be granted. Plaintiffs have filed timely objections and the matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) on de novo review. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); Bhan v. NME Hospitals, Inc., 929 F.2d 1404, 1415 (9th Cir.1991).
Plaintiffs bring this action under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Department of Transportation v. Public CitizenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blue Mountains Biodiversity Project v. BlackwoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Neighbors of Cuddy Mountain v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- WildEarth Guardians v. JeffriesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- LEAGUE OF WILD. DEFEN. v. US Forest Serv.District Court, D. Oregon · 2006