Legal Opinion

Hamby v. Pye

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 14, 1943No. 14364PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Presiding- Justice.

1. “The subsequent voluntary cohabitation of the husband and wife shall annul and set aside all provision made, either by deed or decree, for permanent alimony.” Code, § 30-217.

2. Where a wife recovers a judgment against her husband for a stated sum as permanent alimony and an additional sum as attorney’s fees, the attorney’s fees are treated as part of a total sum allowed as alimony, although they are to be paid to or for the wife’s attorney. Glenn v. Hill, 50 Ga. 94; Van Dyke v. Van Dyke, 125 Ga. 491 (2) (54 S. E. 537); Stokes v. Stokes, 127 Ga. 160 (2) (56 S. E.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Gosserand v. MonteleoneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  3. Bell v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Johnson v. GeraldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Van Dyke v. Van DykeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Travis v. TravisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  2. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  3. Finch v. FinchSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. Moss v. MossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  5. Dempsey v. DempseySupreme Court of Georgia · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API