Legal Opinion
Mullinax, Wells, Baab & Cloutman, P.C. v. Sage
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided April 24, 1985No. 05-84-00543-CVPublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
WHITHAM, Justice.
We grant the motion for rehearing of appellees in order that we might delete an erroneous statement made in our original opinion. Accordingly, we withdraw our opinion of March 12, 1985. The following is now our opinion.
Attorneys-appellant, Mullinax, Wells, Baab and Cloutman, P.C., brought this action against client-appellees, Richard Sage and Charles A. Gulden, to enforce a decision and award of the Fee Disputes Committee of the Dallas Bar Association in favor of the attorneys. We learn from a memorandum decision filed by the trial court that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- L. H. Lacy Co. v. City of LubbockTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Fairchild & Co. v. Richmond, Fredericksburg & Potomac RailroadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1981
- Williams v. CasselCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
3Cited by24 opinions
- GJR Management Holdings, L.P. v. Jack Raus, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
- IPCO-G.&C. Joint Venture v. A.B. Chance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2002
- International Bank of Commerce-Brownsville v. International Energy Development Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- LAS PALMAS MEDICAL CENTER v. Moore, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2010
- Peacock v. Wave Tec Pools, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2003
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.