Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. Hale
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
LUMPKIN, Justice.
' The principal question to be determined on this appeal is whether the record shows, as a matter of law, that at the time of his injury the appellee, James Floyd Hale, occupied the status of a Texas employee of the Warren and Bradshaw Drilling Company. The appellee claims that although he was injured in New Mexico, he was, nevertheless, “an employee, .who had been hired in this 'State.” The suit was brought under the extra-territorial provisions of the Texas Workmen’s Compensation Act, Article 8306, Section 19, Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes.
The appellant, Texas…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 1914
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. McLaughlinTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. VolekTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
- Southern Underwriters v. GallagherTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. of Wis. v. EvinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hale v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'N.Texas Supreme Court · 1951
- Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. HaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951