Legal Opinion

Hale v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INS. ASS'N.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1951No. A-2971PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smedley

Petitioner, employee, sues respondent, insurer, for compensation under the Texas Workmen’s Compensation Law on account of injuries suffered in New Mexico, claiming the right to recover by reason of the extraterritorial provisions of the statute, Section 19 of Article 8306 of the Revised Civil Statutes, with its amendments, as appearing in Vernon’s Annotated Civil Statutes.

In addition to issues usually submitted in Workmen’s Compensation cases the trial court submitted to the jury this issue:

“Do you find from a preponderance of the evidence that at the time the plaintiff, Hale, sustained an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. McLaughlinTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. VolekTexas Commission of Appeals · 1934
  3. Southern Underwriters v. GallagherTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Travelers Ins. Co. v. E. CasonTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Texas Employers' Insurance v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Janak v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASSOCIATIONTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Motsenbocker v. WyattTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Puryear v. PorterTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. DosseyTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Franklin v. Geo. P. Livermore, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1954

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API