Legal Opinion
Goodwin v. Castleton
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1944No. 29146PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
A stockholder of a corporation instituted a derivative action on behalf of the corporate body against certain individuals constituting a partnership and against the former, as well as the present, officers and directors of the corporation. The purpose of the action was to procure a decree of court compelling specific performance of a contract alleged to have been entered into by and between the partnership and the corporation, and, at the same time, setting aside a lease agreement made between the same parties; and, further, to recover for alleged fraud, conspiracy, and unconscionable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Corbus v. Alaska Treadwell Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Karasik v. Pacific Eastern Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1935
- Grant v. Greene Consolidated Copper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Grant v. . Greene Consolidated Copper CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Tribble v. Missionary Sisters of the Sacred HeartWashington Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- LaHue v. Keystone Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- State Ex Rel. Weede v. BechtelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Perrine v. Pennroad Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1946
- Ireland v. WynkoopColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.