Legal Opinion

City of Terre Haute v. Kersey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1902No. 19,085PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Erom Yigo Superior Court; S. M. McGregor, Special Judge. Suit by William P. Kersey and others to enjoin the city of Terre Haute from enforcing an ordinance imposing a tax for vehicle license. Erom a judgment for plaintiff's, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

— This appeal brings before us for review an ordinance adopted, and caused to be published, by the common council of the city of Terre Haute, Indiana, on January 7, 1899, imposing a license tax to be paid by the owners of certain vehicles used on the public streets of said city. The action was instituted in the lower court by William P. Kersey, in conjunction with his co-appellees herein, six in number, suing for themselves and in behalf of 5,000 others similarly situated, to enjoin appellant from enforcing against them the ordinance in controversy, for the reason that the same was wholly…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. GreenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. City of St. Louis v. GreenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  3. Gartside v. City of East St. LouisIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Adams v. Ohio Falls Car Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Tomlinson v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Sprout v. City of South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Harder's Fire Proof Storage & Van Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Park v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API